| "If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land." II Chronicles 7:14; |
|
This, of course, would never be practical today, but a lot of good men and women would have died, and will probably die, trying to bring such a change about; the said change attempt not being made to destroy the United States Constitutional government, but to restore it from it's present condition to it's original condition. The United States of America has been effectively taken without firing a shot.
This should come as no surprise, however. The United States of America was created by the founding fathers to be the Novus Ordo Seclorum, the "New World Order," or rather the seed and tool of the New World Order to establish it solidly. The United States was to be a tool, not the end.
What does this have to do with Kosovo et al? The goal of the New World Order is to rule the world. Benjamin Franklin said it succinctly when the early colonists were about to take on Great Britain: "Gentlemen, surely we must all hang together, or else we will all hang separately!" The world has few countries that can offer, each on it's own, a serious threat to the United States. This is by design of the New World Order, which intends to keep this status quo just as it is.
Suppose for a moment that no one interfered in these civil wars in areas where, were one side to triumph over the other, a disunited area of the world would become united politically. In other words, in the area in which NATO is now bombing, suppose that NATO had stayed out of it and one side were to win? The winnings would be the whole area. Three countries would unite into one country. This large country would pose a more serious military threat to "NATO" than the sum threat potentials of three disunited, divided countries. No, there cannot be a hint of a threat, a potential significant threat, to the singular world police force of the United States. One big guy who can whip any one or two of the little guys is what is desired. Psychologically, and logistically, it is much more difficult to unite many small entities than to unite a few larger entities. Keep them small and you can keep them psychologically and logistically too weak to pose a threat. This works at the individual level and at the state level.
So whenever it appears that a unification can happen, regardless of the method used to bring about this unification, the United States steps in and prevents this unification.
Look at the history of the United States for an excellent example. Suppose that when we began our civil war, there had been the equivalent of the United States/NATO at that time. Had this been the case, we would today have at least two nations, and probably at least three i.e. The United States of America, the Confederate States of America, and the Republic of Texas. Odds are that the two larger of these would actually be divided still further; and what we now call the United States would actually appear more like Europe than what it looks like today. We would not be the superpower we are if we had not been allowed to bring our civil war to completion, bloody as it was, so that the USA could become the united giant it became.
This is the goal of the New World Order i.e. to use it's big police force against any place in the world which, as it coalesces, begins to appear to offer a respectable potential troublemaker to the established New World Order.
When the wall came down in Germany, this was not a victory for anyone but the New World Order. It was not a victory for the peace of the world, because now the nuclear threat became uncontrolled; whereas before there was a degree of control. It was not a victory for the Soviets. Their economy under socialism was not that great, granted; but it was a lot better than it is now, unless you are in the Soviet Mafia. The Soviet Union represented a too-large force for the New World Order to police. The standoff had to come to an end if the United States was to fulfill it's designed purpose. Now the Soviet Union is no more, pragmatically speaking, and the United States is the super power.
But the United States is not the sovereign power we all want to think it is. We have been sold out systematically, especially in the last two decades. The last sovereign president we had was John F. Kennedy, and even then we were hanging on to sovereignty by a thread which has since been snapped.
But we should not be surprised at this. The founding fathers should have known we would not be sovereign because they designed this into the Constitution when they made it amendable and when they established the judicial system. There is no difference between a king and a judge who is not elected and cannot be removed when speaking pragmatically, especially when the judge or judges have the final say regarding law. The founding fathers must have known human nature and the nature of corrupting influences.
This, and not the logistical difficulty of elections by the people, is why they established a "democratic republic," an oxymoronic term at best. A "democracy" and a "republic" are as different as apples and oranges. It is one thing to influence a few men, and another to influence millions.
And so the plan was set in place with the founding of the nation by Masonics with the dream of establishing the New World Order with the United States as it's primary ensign, but not as a sovereign ensign. Yes, they put the words into the Declaration of Independence about how it is our duty to right this wrong that has been done to us, knowing full well that by the time such a wrong becomes apparent, the unity of the people would be no match for the state.
So here we sit, watching our televisions as we see our nation proudly displaying images from the smart bombs destroying people who are just like you and me, who believed in their nations' sovereignty, who would be minding their own businesses if we weren't blowing them up. Their own business of course might include war with their neighbors, but that's their business, isn't it? What business is it of ours? It's "our" business because someone usually wins a war and as a result two or more nations become one stronger nation under one leadership, and that's a greater threat to the New World Order.
As to whether or not the United States will do the same to Israel, I have "news" for you i.e. that isn't going to happen. "Israel" as the political entity is called today may have been established to be a homeland to the Jews by the United Nations, but it now has become a hotspot so the United States could step in and "defend it", in reality taking over the area with the blessings of it's naive populous, with the purpose of establishing a foothold in the Middle East to protect the Arab financial interests there. The United States belongs to the Arab nations. We are absolutely nothing more or less than their puppet to be used as they see fit. Ultimately the Arab nations own us, literally and completely. The ownership is complicated and difficult for any one person to comprehend completely, but the ownership is real.
The Arab nations despise the so-called "Palestinian" people. They hate them almost as much as they hate Jews. Nothing would suit the Arabs more than if the Israelis and the Palestinians could somehow destroy each other forever, to the last man, woman, and child, and leave everything else untouched. They want to kill the Jews and give "Israel" to the Palestinians because they don't want the "Palestinians" in their own countries. I know what I'm talking about. During my visit by a nephew of one of the Sheiks of the United Arab Emirates a couple of years ago we discussed the Palestinians. He told me that the Palestinians have infiltrated all of their businesses and economics like maggots. He said that they are robbing them blind, siphoning off wealth and resources. In essence, the Palestinians are considered a very undesirable parasite that all Arab nations would like to see eliminated.
So, a war in Israel is designed and will soon be implemented, but proper preparations have to be made ahead of time. The United States has a huge stockpile of antiquated weapons, but wants new ones. To get these, Congress must be convinced of the necessity of such an upscale in manpower and ordinance. So guess what? We now we have a war going on presently. We are going to need more bombs, more recruits. The world has to be policed, right? Perhaps Congress will give Mr. Bill what he wants, and Mr. Bill will soon be praised as a hero for defending Israel. You have to remember that Mr. Bill is only pro-Palestinian because being so pressures Israel to become more vulnerable and thus more in need of defense by the United States. Ditto for Albright and the others. No nation on earth is really pro-Palestinian, but by taking the pro-Palestinian position they give the Palestinians sufficient false hope to declare a Palestinian state and bring the steel rain down upon themselves.
I look at the ads being run on television -- recruiting ads for the various branches of the military, which started before we ever started bombing those innocents over there in Europe who had their own conflicts and should have been left to settle them alone. James E. Mays
[In The News Main Page ]
[Hope of Israel Main Page ]
Commentary on Current Events
By James E. Mays
Editor's Note: Just another indication that the Times of Jacob's Trouble are close at hand. Repent Oh Israel! Return to our CREATOR, YHWH, The Holy One of Israel.
